RE: [802SEC] IEEE-SA CAG considering sponsoring competing standards to IEEE 802
You are correct - it was suppose to be "I do not think"
From: Geoff Thompson [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 6:31 PM
To: THALER,PAT (A-Roseville,ex1)
Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
Subject: RE: [802SEC] IEEE-SA CAG considering sponsoring competing
standards to IEEE 802
Is what you typed what you meant?
You think that the (immature and untested) CAG should be able to force its
will on the established process?
I would guess that meant to type a "not" in there.
At 07:20 PM 2/12/2004 -0700, email@example.com wrote:
>However, I do think an ability of the CAG to force entity voting by
>writing a PAR is appropriate or correct.