Re: [802SEC] EC Motion to Conditionally Approve Forwarding of P802.17 to Revcom
I appreciate the forthright and easily understood report on 802.17/D3.2
comment resolution. While I concur with your decision that the D3.2
ballot resolution failed to meet the conditions of Procedure 10 for
RevCom consideration, I do not believe you need another contitional
I find nothing in Procedure 10 that would require it. Per Procedure 10,
the motion expires at the next plenary session, not at compeletion of a
recirculation ballot. Only if your March motion was specific to D3.2,
would you need to go forward with another motion. That certainly isn't
the case for the below motion.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of
> Mike Takefman
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 11:00 AM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: [802SEC] EC Motion to Conditionally Approve
> Forwarding of P802.17 to Revcom
> Dear EC Members,
> In the preceding email, I detailed the results of our
> last recirculation ballot and our plan moving forward.
> I therefore make the following EC email ballot motion:
> Move to conditionally approve forwarding P802.17 to RevCom under
> procedure 10 of the LMSC P&P.
> May I have a second?
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
> reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.