Re: [802SEC] Attendance Credit At LMSC WG Meetings
I think that the LMSC P&P clearly states that a person must be present
for 75% of a meeting to be considered as participating in the meeting.
So having been made aware of someone who has signed in but not
participated, you are not to grant credit toward membership for those
meetings. You may as chair, of course, grant membership at your
Personally, I would select option 1 and make sure the person knows why
they are not getting credit. They might learn from the experience.
[mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of John Lemon
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 3:56 PM
Subject: [802SEC] Attendance Credit At LMSC WG Meetings
More experienced ones:
I'm seeking some advice on how to handle a claim of attendance at the
most recent plenary meeting. One person managed to sign-in for 75% of
the half-day sign-in slots for 802.17. However, said person was not
actually in attendance for more than a few minutes for some of those
What would you recommend we do in such a situation?
1. Strike the sign-ins for the periods when the person was in attendance
for only a few minutes, and notify them of the action?
2. Strike the sign-ins for the periods when the person was in attendance
for only a few minutes, without notifying them of the action?
3. Count this as a learning experience and institute tighter control on
the sign-in booklet in the future?
If you chose 3, how would you recommend preventing this abuse in the
Tony, I came in to the 802.1 meeting for our joint 802.1/802.17 meeting
just as you were finishing saying something about this to the 802.1
participants. I missed most of what you said. Could you repeat it here?
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.