|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
I'm voting approve but there is one paragraph I would like to see clarified. In the last paragraph of 188.8.131.52, it isn't clear to me whether it is really saying what it means. Does may not be considered again apply only to the vote on final approval or does it mean that there has to be an entirely quiet plenary to plenary cycle on the issue of the change? If final approval of a change is rejected at plenary n, can a new version of the change be approved for sending out to ballot at plenary n so that final approval can occur at plenary n + 1 or must one wait to plenary n + 1 to initiate the first ballot on a revised change?
It might be better to replace that paragraph with "If LMSC approval is not achieved, the proposed revision is rejected. Any future consideration will require initiation of a proposed P & P Revision as in 184.108.40.206." This leaves the Proposer and the Executive Committee the freedom to decide whether the matter is urgent enough and understood enough to justify initiating a new change ballot at the current plenary or whether to wait (or drop the matter entirely).
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)
Sent: Saturday, 01 January, 2005 6:21 AM
Subject: [802SEC] FW: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ P&P_Revision_Process
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.