| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
All, I think I said on the telecon today that
we had agreed to open our reflector during the prior P&P ballot (for the
P&P revision process). Apparently I was wrong (see below), so we may need
to reexamine the openness requirement. As Bob point out in the attached
e-mail, everyone has access to our e-mails via an archive. This does
constitute openness. I’d like to believe it is sufficient openness. But
if people feel otherwise, then we will have to address that. Mat Matthew Sherman, Ph.D. From: Bob O'Hara
[mailto:bob@airespace.com] We discussed this and it is not
open. We did not decide to open it, since anyone can request a
subscription, which will then be forwarded to me for approval. I approve
all subscription requests. In addition, if all they want to do is
observe, all the EC emails are on the web site. -Bob -----Original Message----- Hi
Bob, I
know we talked about making the EC reflector open for subscription by
observers. Any idea when that would occur. Thanks, Mat Senior
Member Technical Staff BAE
SYSTEMS, CNIR Office:
+1 973.633.6344 email:
matthew.sherman@baesystems.com |