Re: [802SEC] FW: new work
If you already have the separate files, why do they need to be combined
and balloted together? I would rather that these be balloted
separately. It makes it easier to read and to comment on them for the
From: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:18 AM
Subject: [802SEC] FW: new work
Just so you have an idea of what I will be 'batching', here are some of
the proposed changes from ML. In addition I will have a recommended
change from Geoff on the adding of 'proprietary' footers etc. on e-mail
and other contributions. I will be the EC member proposing the ballots.
What I will do is present to the EC on Friday each 'rationale' and step
through the changes quickly. If there is substantial objection to
balloting a specific change, I will divide the question and vote that
specific rationale and proposed change separately. Hopefully this will
make for a more efficient process. Again, if people think this is a bad
idea, please let me know.
Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Senior Member Technical Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
Office: +1 973.633.6344
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 8:19 PM
To: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)
Subject: new work
OK, Mat, here's my cut at the new work, in four documents:
WG ballot recircs
LMK what you think. I will check email later tonight and will be at work
(See attached file: 802.0-ballot-recircs--D1.doc)(See attached file:
802.0-sect-9--D1.doc)(See attached file: 802.0-SG_Process--D1.doc)(See
attached file: 802.0-WG_Structure--D1.doc)
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.