Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] criteria for posting information to EC reflector



I agree with Paul's proposal and guidelines.
Regards,
Jerry Upton

In a message dated 7/26/2005 5:35:31 PM Central Standard Time, 
paul.nikolich@ATT.NET writes:
Dear EC Members,

Roger has brought up an interesting issue with respect to whether or not it 
is appropriate to put the attachment with high level contract terms in 
Buzz's motion on the reflector.  I decided it was acceptable because the EC 
has had similar information from Buzz included in their minutes in the past.

The larger question of exactly what is acceptable to post onto the reflector 
remains, however.  We don't have any crisp guidelines.  I would like to hear 
from the EC members on what they think is an appropriate set of guidelines 
on this topic, then I'll include it in the chair's guidelines document.

To get the list started, in my opinion the following information should be 
kept private:

- final vendor contracts for review and approval (on the other hand, high 
level summary of terms and conditions are appropriate for posting)
- any personal information (all reflector traffic should be strictly 802 
business related)
- any information that has been explicitly deemed 'confidential and 
proprietary'
- any information the EC has explicitly decided to be of 'executive 
privilege'

Regards,

--Paul

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This 
list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.