Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] criteria for posting information to EC reflector



I agree with Paul's "short list" and if I think of anything I think should
be added, I will propose it.

Carl
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Nikolich [mailto:paul.nikolich@ATT.NET] 
> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 9:18 AM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: [802SEC] criteria for posting information to EC reflector
> 
>  Dear EC Members,
> 
>  Roger has brought up an interesting issue with respect to 
> whether or not it  is appropriate to put the attachment with 
> high level contract terms in  Buzz's motion on the reflector. 
>  I decided it was acceptable because the EC  has had similar 
> information from Buzz included in their minutes in the past.
> 
>  The larger question of exactly what is acceptable to post 
> onto the reflector  remains, however.  We don't have any 
> crisp guidelines.  I would like to hear  from the EC members 
> on what they think is an appropriate set of guidelines  on 
> this topic, then I'll include it in the chair's guidelines document.
> 
>  To get the list started, in my opinion the following 
> information should be  kept private:
> 
>  a) final vendor contracts for review and approval (on the 
> other hand, high  level summary of terms and conditions are 
> appropriate for posting)
> 
> b) any personal information (all reflector traffic should be 
> strictly 802  business related)
> 
> c) any information that has been explicitly deemed 
> 'confidential and  proprietary'
> 
> d) any information the EC has explicitly decided to be of 
> 'executive  privilege'
> 
>  Regards,
> 
>  --Paul
> 
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email 
> reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.
> 
> 

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.