Re: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ WG Plenary
I too am inclined to support Roger suggestion.
When the voting is over, I plan to do comment resolution. But before I
do, I'd like to hear from everyone whether:
1) my original concept had a prayer (ie don't even bother
2) Roger's idea is the best way forward
3) We shouldn't be playing with this....
I am particularly interested in the opinion of the larger groups since I
feel they are the most impacted. One difference between Roger's idea
and my original idea is that Roger's doesn't help role people off
quicker from the membership, where as mine would.
Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Senior Member Technical Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
Office: +1 973.633.6344
From: Carl R. Stevenson [mailto:wk3c@WK3C.COM]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ WG Plenary
I still vote disapprove, but I am inclined to support Roger's
which I think is elegant in its simplicity, with the following suggested
I think that a year's notice may be a bit onerous for interims and
whether 6 months might be adequate notice.
In my view, knowing 6 months in advance that an interim was going to be
and where seems to certainly be enough time to allow someone to plan to
attend if they want to participate ...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 9:02 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ WG Plenary
> I vote Disapprove. I will change my vote to Approve provided
> the following changes are made:
> (1) Eliminate all of the P&P changes proposed in the ballot.
> (2) Specify that, in subclause 126.96.36.199.1 "Voting at Meeting,"
> immediate after the sentence:
> "No quorum is required at meetings held in conjunction with
> the Plenary session since the Plenary session time and place
> is established well in advance."
> the following sentence shall be added:
> "Likewise, no quorum is required at interim sessions provided
> that their time and place are established and publicly
> announced at least one year in advance and that this
> information is readily available to the public during that year."
> At 10:34 PM -0500 06/01/02, Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) wrote:
> >Dear EC members,
> >Attached you will find the text for an LMSC P&P revision
> ballot titled
> >'WG Plenary'. This ballot was approved at the Friday
> November 18, 2005
> >EC meeting. The text is identical to that presented at the
> meeting (but
> >for one minor typo that has been corrected). The purpose
> and rationale
> >for the ballot are as given in the attached ballot document.
> >Ballot Duration: 1/2/2005 - 2/2/2005 @ 11:59 PM EST
> >WG/TAG chairs, please distribute this P&P revision ballot to your
> >groups, and invite them to comment through you. Please direct any
> >comments on this revision to the reflector for collection.
> Note that I
> >intend to hold a comment resolution telecon for this ballot
> on 2/9/05 @
> >12 PM EST. Further details will follow.
> >Thanks & Regards,
> >Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
> >Senior Member Technical Staff
> >BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
> >Office: +1 973.633.6344
> >email: email@example.com
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
> reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.