Re: [802SEC] Potential EC Motion
The motion says the CA will "be distributed."
The motion does not say whether:
the CA document itself is to be open for review and comment
the CA document is distributed for information only.
If the motion said:
"...distribute that CA document as an integral part of the draft..."
that would be clear.
Other textural remedies would also be acceptable.
I urge my colleagues on the EC to either withhold their votes or vote NO
until the proposal is definitively clarified.
At 11:47 AM 3/16/2006 , Shellhammer, Steve wrote:
>Any wireless project intended for unlicensed operation, that could
>potentially cause interference to an 802 wireless standard, and whose
>PAR was approved prior to November 2004 and begins working group letter
>ballot after November 2004 shall produce a coexistence assurance
>document and distribute that CA document with working group letter
>ballot and Sponsor ballot.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.