Re: [802SEC] +++Motion for P802.3-2005/Cor1 Conditional Approval
I vote Approve.
Roger
At 03:29 PM -0400 06/04/20, Paul Nikolich wrote:
>All,
>
>I designated Bob Grow to conduct the ballot at the March 2006
>plenary session. I apologize for not making that clear at the time.
>
>Bob Grow has made the motion, received a second (Roger Marks) and I
>consider the ballot to have started when the second was publically
>announced (4:35pm et 19APR). The duration is 5 days, the ballot
>closes 4:35pm et 24APR2006.
>
>I expect Bob Grow to tally and announce the interim and final
>results as he sees fit.
>
>Regards,
>
>--Paul Nikolich
>802 Chairman
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger B. Marks" <r.b.marks@ieee.org>
>To: <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
>Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 12:38 PM
>Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++Motion for P802.3-2005/Cor1 Conditional Approval
>
>>John,
>>
>>Perhaps I am mistaken, but it's my impression that there is no
>>ballot underway yet.
>>
>>As I understand the procedure, "The LMSC Chair, or an EC member
>>designated by the Chair (usually a Vice Chair), shall determine the
>>duration of the ballot, issue the ballot by e-mail and tally the
>>votes after the ballot is closed."
>>
>>Under normal circumstances, once a motion is made and seconded, we
>>get a ballot announcement, such as
>><http://ieee802.org/secmail/msg07768.html>, from the Chair (or from
>>someone else, with a designation from the Chair). The bare minimum
>>needed in such an announcement is a notification that the ballot is
>>underway, a statement of the motion, and a deadline.
>>
>>I'm awaiting such an announcement before I cast a vote.
>>
>>Roger
>>
>>
>>At 12:08 PM -0400 06/04/20, John Hawkins wrote:
>>>I approve
>>>j
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
>>>[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Grow, Bob
>>>Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 3:35 PM
>>>To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
>>>Subject: [802SEC] +++Motion for P802.3-2005/Cor1 Conditional Approval
>>>
>>>Colleagues:
>>>
>>>Per agreement at the closing EC meeting in March, the following motion
>>>for five-day ballot has been moved and seconded.
>>>Grant conditional approval for submittal of P802.3-2005/Cor1 to RevCom
>>>per Clause 20 of the LMSC P&P.
>>>Moved: Bob Grow
>>>Seconded: Roger Marks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>BACKGROUND
>>>
>>>If the one negative balloter converts their vote to Approve with
>>>comment, no recirculation ballot need be conducted as no substantive
>>>changes have been made to the draft. If the negative balloter desires
>>>their comment and rebuttal to be reviewed by the ballot group a
>>>recirculation will be conducted on that one comment. I will report per
>>>the conditions in Clause 20 in either case.
>>>
>>>Ballot Open Date: 03/10/2006
>>>Ballot Close Date: 04/10/2006
>>>
>>>Response Rate
>>>This ballot has met the 75% returned ballot requirement. 103
>>>eligible people in this ballot group. 79 affirmative votes
>>>1 negative votes with comments
>>>0 negative votes without comments
>>>2 abstention votes
>>>82 votes received = 80 % returned
>>>2 % abstention
>>>
>>>Approval Rate
>>>The 75% affirmation requirement is being met. 79 affirmative votes
>>>1 negative votes with comments
>>>80 votes = 99% affirmative
>>>
>>>Comments
>>>5 comments received
>>>One omega symbol in the draft is displayed as an alpha character because
>>>of incorrect font. The identical text occurs three times in the draft,
>>>twice with the omega symbol (for ohms) and once with an alpha character.
>>>
>>>The editor will add spaces to change a few unit occurrences from "Vdc"
>>>to "V dc" per IEEE style
>>>Some front matter (not part of the approved draft/standard) changes
>>>recommended by the WG Chair were forwarded to the publication editor for
>>>consideration during publication preparation.
>>>At present, there remains one negative comment that was rejected by the
>>>ballot resolution group with rebuttal The D2.0 comment file with
>>>responses is posted at:
>>>http://www.ieee802.org/3/au/comments/D2.0/802.3au_D2p0.pdf.
>>>
>>>----------
>>>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>>>This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>
>>>----------
>>>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
>>>reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>
>>----------
>>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
>>reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.