Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email ballot (closes no later than 25SEP2006)+++ Motion to approve the attached EC SC6 recommendation
I agree that Geoffs changes should be made.
Consider my vote now disapprove.
mike
-------------------------------------------
Michael Takefman tak@cisco.com
Distinguished Engineer, Cisco Systems
Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
3000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
voice: 613-254-3399 cell:613-220-6991
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
> [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Geoff Thompson
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 4:10 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email ballot (closes no later
> than 25SEP2006)+++ Motion to approve the attached EC SC6
> recommendation
>
> Paul/Colleagues-
>
> I have to join Carl and recommend that these slides be DISAPPROVED
>
> Please examine these points carefully. I believe they are
> worthy of consideration
>
> The text, early on (slide 4) says:
> - * 8802-1 should be modified so that international
> standardisation can always be achieved ...
>
> ...which (were there an appropriate WTO case and were I
> supporting the "other" side) I would take as evidence for
> presentation to the judging
> body: "Here, the IEEE even admits that they are NOT a lower
> case international standard unless they are blessed by ISO/IEC.
>
> I do not think we want to say that
> I do not think that is the case
> I think is not an appropriate position for 802 to take wrt
> the position that the IEEE-SA takes for its standards.
>
> Slide 7 statements open a Pandora's box of issues that might
> well be nurturing to a relationship with SC6.
>
> Slide 9, last bullet
> Change:
> A potential benefit for 802 of a cooperative relationship
> with ISO/IEC is that it provides 802 WG's with the option of
> establishing "international standard" status for an 802.x
> standard through ISO/IEC using a simple documented
> cooperation process.
>
> To:
> A potential benefit for 802 of a cooperative relationship
> with ISO/IEC is that it provides 802 WG's with the option of
> widening "international standard" recognition for an 802.x
> standard through ISO/IEC using a simple documented cooperation process
>
> Slide 11:
> The title:
> "8802-1 should be modified so that international
> standardisation can always be achieved ..."
> should be changed per my critique of slide 4 above.
>
> I support slides 12 through 21
>
> Please carefully consider these items and reconsider your vote
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Geoff Thompson
>
> At 04:23 PM 9/19/2006 , Paul Nikolich wrote:
> >Dear EC Members,
> >
> >A revised version of the IEEE 802 recommendation on the 8802-1 and
> >related documents requested by SC6 is attached for EC approval.
> >
> >Motion: The 802 LMSC EC resolves to adopt the attached SC6
> >recommendation version 07 dated 19SEP06 (appropriately
> edited to remove
> >the "DRAFT" and "Change History" text.)
> >
> >Moved-Tony Jeffree Seconded-Mat Sherman
> >
> >Please cast your vote as soon as possible. The ballot closes the
> >earlier of either 25 Sept 2006 or 24 hours after every EC
> member has cast a vote.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >--Paul Nikolich
> >----------
> >This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
> reflector.
> >This list is maintained by Listserv.
> >
> >
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
> reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.