|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
Roger, I reviewed the 16m PAR and 5C and I have several suggested edits. I want to ensure that this project does not prevent any other working groups from developing solutions for IMT-Advanced, so there are a few edits related to that. I also modified the text regarding the coexistence assurance document in the 5C. I spoke to several people regarding IMT-Advanced and at this point the requirements are not clear enough to say that IMT-Advanced will only operate in licensed bands. The wording is such that a CA document is only required if unlicensed bands are used. Finally, there are a few general edits. The suggested edits are in an attached work document. I made the changes with "track changes" enabled so to make the suggested changes easy to identify. See you in Dallas. Regards, Steve -----Original Message----- From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Roger B. Marks Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 6:09 PM To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org Subject: [802SEC] Draft 802.16m PAR for 802 EC consideration in November Dear 802 EC Colleagues: I am writing to notify you of a new PAR proposal that arose out of the 802.16 WG's September interim session: * P802.16m: <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/80216-06_054.pdf> * Five C: <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/80216-06_055.pdf> To help explain the proposal, we are arranging an accompanying tutorial on Monday evening: * Tutorial: <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/80216-06_056.pdf> Regards, Roger ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv. ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
Suggested wording changes to 802.16m PAR and 5C.doc