Re: [802SEC] Draft 802.16m PAR for 802 EC consideration in November
Thank you for your comments. I will pass these on to the 802.16 WG
for review at the plenary.
On Oct 30, 2006, at 02:47 PM, Shellhammer, Steve wrote:
> I reviewed the 16m PAR and 5C and I have several suggested
> edits. I want to ensure that this project does not prevent any other
> working groups from developing solutions for IMT-Advanced, so there
> a few edits related to that. I also modified the text regarding the
> coexistence assurance document in the 5C. I spoke to several people
> regarding IMT-Advanced and at this point the requirements are not
> enough to say that IMT-Advanced will only operate in licensed bands.
> The wording is such that a CA document is only required if unlicensed
> bands are used. Finally, there are a few general edits.
> The suggested edits are in an attached work document. I made
> the changes with "track changes" enabled so to make the suggested
> changes easy to identify.
> See you in Dallas.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
> [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Roger B. Marks
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 6:09 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: [802SEC] Draft 802.16m PAR for 802 EC consideration in
> Dear 802 EC Colleagues:
> I am writing to notify you of a new PAR proposal that arose out of
> the 802.16 WG's September interim session:
> * P802.16m: <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/80216-06_054.pdf>
> * Five C: <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/80216-06_055.pdf>
> To help explain the proposal, we are arranging an accompanying
> tutorial on Monday evening:
> * Tutorial: <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/80216-06_056.pdf>
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This list is maintained by Listserv.
> <Suggested wording changes to 802.16m PAR and 5C.doc>
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.