[802SEC] Reminder-- I need EC members to respond regarding their classification as a "conflicted" or "non-conflicted" EC member
OK as of 5pm et I have VivekG, RogerM, BobH, BuzzR, SteveS, TonyJ and
StuartK's input in addition to MatS, PatT, JohnH, GeoffT, JohnL, MikeL and
ArnieG. 14 out of 17. 3 more to go.
--Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
To: <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 10:25 AM
Subject: [802SEC] Reminder-- I need EC members to respond regarding their
classification as a "conflicted" or "non-conflicted" EC member
> Dear EC members,
>
> I received responses to the below request from Mat Sherman, Pat Thaler,
> John Hawkins, Geoff Thompson, John Lemon, Mike Lynch and Arnie Greenspan.
> 7 out of 17. I need a response from everyone immediately.
>
> Please send me an email today (7MAY2007) either way--change or no change.
> Furthermore, if you feel that circumstances (i.e., of new events that
> create or dispel a conflict) have changed regarding your classification as
> a "non-conflicted" or "conflicted" EC member regarding 802.20
> matters--please explain.
>
> Regards,
>
> --Paul
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
> To: <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 1:07 PM
> Subject: [802SEC] re-confirmation of the "non-conflicted" EC membership
>
>
>> Dear EC members,
>>
>> If any of you feel that circumstances (i.e., of new events that create or
>> dispel a conflict) have changed regarding your classification as a
>> "non-conflicted" or "conflicted" EC member regarding 802.20 matters, I
>> need
>> to know soon. Please respond directly to me, either way, no-change or
>> change (with a short explanation), no later than midnight Friday 4 May
>> 2007.
>>
>> As you may recall, we went through this process in October (see the
>> attached
>> document) and will need to periodically review our members status. In
>> the
>> future, I will ask EC members if there has been a change in their
>> circumstances in the opening EC meeting of plenary sessions until the
>> non-conflicted is no longer required. Also, if there is a change in your
>> circumstances asynchronous to the once-per-plenary poll, please notify me
>> upon that change.
>>
>> At a minimum, the non-conflicted EC must decide where to classify John
>> Lemon, the new 802.17 Chair. I'm not sure if this can be done via email
>> or
>> a telecon is required--I'll let you know.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --Paul
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
>> To: <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:36 PM
>> Subject: [802SEC] non-conflicted EC member regarding 802.20 WG matters
>> announcement
>>
>>
>> Dear EC members and 802.20 WG members,
>>
>> In order to meet the directive announced by the IEEE SA Standards Board
>> on
>> 19SEP2006
>> (http://standards.ieee.org/announcements/IEEESASB802.20Report.pdf)
>> 11 IEEE 802 LMSC Executive Committee members were determined to be
>> non-conflicted with respect to 802.20 WG matters as per the attached
>> document.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --Paul Nikolich
>>
>> ----------
>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>> This
>> list is maintained by Listserv.
>>
>> ----------
>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>> This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
> list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.