Re: [802SEC] RE: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ AudCom
I agree with Steve and vote NO, but will also change my vote to YES if the
changes Steve requests are made.
Carl
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org] On
Behalf Of Shellhammer, Steve
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 7:43 PM
To: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA); STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [802SEC] RE: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ AudCom
Mat,
I vote NO but will change my vote to a YES if the following
changes are made,
Section 7.1.2
* Under non-voting members add "Parliamentarian"
Section 7.1.2.1
* Remove "a) Decide which matters are procedural and technical."
The executive committee does not decide technical maters so all maters are
procedural.
* Remove "c) Place technical issues to a vote by WG members"
Section 7.2.1.2
* In "b) Record and publish minutes of each meeting within 60
calendar days of the end of meeting." change 60 to 30. There is no reason
the minutes cannot be published within 30 days.
Section 7.2.2.3
* In "b) Record and publish minutes of each meeting within 60
calendar days of the end of meeting." change 60 to 30. There is no reason
the minutes cannot be published within 30 days.
Section 12
* The text states "Both technical and procedural appeals may be
made." I am unclear on what basis someone can make a technical appeal.
Please include in the document the basis of a technical appeal.
<CRS> I don't think that the EC should be making technical decision (ruling
on technical appeals - whatever those are?) Technical decisions should be
formed through consensus in the WGs.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.