Re: [802SEC] +++Email Ballot: ITU-R Liaison Response+++
I fully support the intent of the letter, but because of some IEEE-SA
activities I'm involved in am sensitized to one thing.
It would be more accurate if the last three "IEEE" were changed to "IEEE
802". While the second paragraph makes it clear that the letter is the
opinion of IEEE 802, These three (especially the last) would better
agree with the indicated level of approval if changed to IEEE 802. (I'm
assuming without checking that 8F/1065 was approved by the EC.)
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Michael Lynch
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 4:33 AM
Subject: [802SEC] +++Email Ballot: ITU-R Liaison Response+++
Dear EC Members,
This message announces a ten-day EC email ballot.
Motion: "To approve the liaison statement L802.16-07/038d1, conditional
on approval by the IEEE 802.16 Working Group of its Working Group Letter
Moved: Mike Lynch
Seconded: Roger Marks
The document L802.16-07/038d1 is at:
Further information and additional documentation:
Note: Password to access draft recommendations will be provided to EC
This ballot opens on 10 June 2007 and closes on 20 June 2007 at 23:59
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.