Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Interpretation of current P&P



Good point...

Matthew Sherman, Ph.D. 
Engineering Fellow 
BAE Systems -  Network Systems (NS) 
Office: +1 973.633.6344 
Cell: +1 973.229.9520 
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com

 

 


-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Carl R. Stevenson
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 2:23 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Interpretation of current P&P

Dear all,

While the words may not say *exactly* that, I concur with Roger's
interpretation of the intent of our provision as meaning "four two year
terms" (or at least the better part of the span of 4 March to
March_plus_2_years terms ... I don't think that it was ever intended
that a
matter a few weeks would make a difference)

Having said that, I want to make it clear that I am not suggesting that
Tony
should be forced from office, that I respect his service, and that I
strongly suspect that if he wishes to continue he would likely get his
WG's
endorsement to do so ...

Matt: ... I think we should clarify this in a future P&P revision.

Regards,
Carl
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG 
> [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of 
> Roger B. Marks
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 1:20 PM
> To: Tony Jeffree
> Cc: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] Interpretation of current P&P
> 
> Tony,
> 
> I think that the intent of "eight years" is "four two-year terms".
> 
> On the other hand, if we take the "eight years" literally, then I  
> think we ought to look at the calendar. According to my records, the  
> March 2000 session ended on 9 March and the March 2008 session opens  
> on 17 March.
> 
> Roger
> 
> 
> On Oct 29, 2007, at 10:59 AM, Tony Jeffree wrote:
> 
> > I have a question for clarification of the current P&P with regard  
> > to the wording in 7.2.2. It states:
> >
> > "An individual who has served as Chair or Vice Chair of a given WG  
> > for a total of more than
> > eight years in that office may not run for election to that office  
> > again, unless the question of
> > allowing that individual to run for election again is 
> approved by a  
> > 75% vote of the WG one
> > plenary in advance of that election."
> >
> > I am now in my 8th year as 802.1 Chair, having first been 
> appointed  
> > Chair at the end of the March 2000 Plenary session. So when the  
> > elections are run in March 2008, I will have been Chair for not  
> > quite 8 years, as the appointment occurs at the end of the session  
> > (see 7.1.2). I therefore interpret the above as meaning that I  
> > don't need a 75% approval vote of my WG in November to allow me to  
> > run for re-election in March. Is my interpretation correct?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tony
> >
> > ----------
> > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email  
> > reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.
> 
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email 
> reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.
> 

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.