|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
Folks, This material was provided to me by Bob Grow as a further basis for discussions tonight. As with my version, Bob has noted it is not yet complete, but is another starting point to consider. Regards, Mat Matthew Sherman, Ph.D. Engineering Fellow BAE Systems - Network Systems (NS) Office: +1 973.633.6344 Cell: +1 973.229.9520 email: firstname.lastname@example.org -----Original Message----- From: Grow, Bob [mailto:email@example.com] Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 12:23 AM To: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) Subject: RE: Rules meeting Mat: I actually went the other way. I've been cut and pasting into the baseline, largely leaving what was there to remind me what the requirements are. Also heavy use of comments and notes. It is far from complete, but I did a fairly complete pass through our old P&P and have sorted with colored notes. Yellow is for transfer to the P&P, orange to our new Ops Manual, red is a fundamental issue to resolve. I also have a couple thing in there that just don't make sense to me. Don't know if this will help, but it is an initial cut at an independent pass. --Bob -----Original Message----- From: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 9:02 PM To: Grow, Bob Subject: RE: Rules meeting Bob, Attached is my current draft. This process is incredibly painful, and probably a mistake. Frankly I don't like the baseline at all. It simply is too restrictive for an organization like LMSC to fit into. I am collecting my comments to feed back to Audcom. My biggest at the moment is that you only allow the EC to have majority votes (see clause 7 which can't be modified). This must be an error. I should be allowed to specify a supermajority. If nothing else, calling the question in Robert's rules would require that. Anyway, I will continue to struggle through and hope to have a draft of the new P&P by tomorrow. No way I'll finish the Ops Manual. And to conform with the Model P&P, a lot will have to change. Mat Matthew Sherman, Ph.D. Engineering Fellow BAE Systems - Network Systems (NS) Office: +1 973.633.6344 Cell: +1 973.229.9520 email: email@example.com -----Original Message----- From: Grow, Bob [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 11:54 PM To: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) Subject: Rules meeting Mat: FYI, I have made a pass through the LMSC P&P with a recommendation on where everything should go, plus some comments. I've also started on moving stuff into the baseline template (might be able to do some more work on the plane. I really think we need a direction on who the sponsor is before putting a lot of work into it though. I'll be pushing for that under you agenda item. --Bob ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.