Re: [802SEC] +++Un-conflicted EC motion #4 to determine Mark Klerer's unconflcted/conflicted classification+++closes not later than 5MAY+++
I have a major problem with this motion, and must vote against it.
The motion attempts not only to disenfranchise the 802.20 Chair, but
also his Workking Group. As I said in my previous post, we seem to be
doing this as a logical consequence of a decision that has been
imposed on us by the Standards Board, and I believe it to be an
unintended consequence of their action that the SB didn't think through.
I believe that the correct way to deal with this issue is to request
assistance from the Standards Board to determine how to proceed, and
in the meantime, vote against this motion.
At 21:11 25/04/2008, J Lemon wrote:
>On 4/24/2008 9:07 AM, Paul Nikolich wrote:
>>Dear UC-EC members,
>>The following motion made by John Lemon and seconded by John Hawkins.
>>Whereas, Mark Klerer could be considered by a reasonable person to
>>have a personal interest in the outcome of votes on matters
>>concerning IEEE P802.20, Mark Klerer shall not be added to the
>>Unconflicted EC roster.
>>This is a 10 day email ballot of the UC-EC. The ballot closes 24
>>hours after the sooner of when all eligible UC-EC voting members
>>(John Hawkins, Buzz Rigsbee, Mike Lynch, Tony Jeffree, Bob Heile,
>>John Lemon and Paul Nikolich if needed to break a tie) have cast a ballot or
>>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>>This list is maintained by Listserv.
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
>reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.