Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] OM 3.1.1 LMSC Function, item(e) comment action item

As frequently occurs, I find myself in violent agreement with Tony.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG 
> [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of 
> Tony Jeffree
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 9:30 AM
> To: Bruce Kraemer
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] OM 3.1.1 LMSC Function, item(e) comment 
> action item
> Bruce -
> I would sincerely hope that the intent is NOT to get us into a major 
> outbreak of EC members making detailed comments on draft contents as 
> part of the EC review of a project - if they want to do that, then 
> they already have a means of doing it; either make comments on WG 
> ballots (anyone can do that, regardless of membership, and WGs have 
> to consider them), or join a Sponsor ballot group.
> I believe the intent here is that the EC should be able to comment on 
> technical issues at a rather higher level - as Paul has said, in 
> order to ensure that the right attention is paid to cross-WG issues & 
> overall architecture, but also to ensure that projects meet their 
> commitments as documented in PAR and 5C documents.
> Regards,
> Tony

This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.