[802SEC] Question regarding OM 3.1.1c--WG and TAG charters

[Paul Nikolich <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>]

All,

I was reviewing the thread associated with the scope of EC oversight and the 
phrase "as it relates to their charters" caught my attention.  We don't have 
written WG and TAG "charters" on file.  Should we?

Regards,

--Paul


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 12:56 PM
Subject: [802SEC] OM 3.1.1 LMSC Function, item(e) comment action item


Mat,

Per today's call, I had the action to provide alternative wording to the OM 
3.1.1.e "Examine and approve WG draft standards for proper submission to 
Sponsor ballot group; not for technical content.

I suggest the deletion of  "; not for technical content"

Implementing the deletion maintains consistency with the OM 3.1.1.c "Provide 
procedural and, if necessary, TECHNICAL GUIDANCE to the WG and TAG as it 
relates to their charters." (emphasis added)

Altough the 'technical guidance' component of the EC funtions tends to be 
secondary to procedural guidance, it is an important component, especially 
when trying to maintain architectural consistency across a Sponsor which 
grows to the size and breadth of 802.

Regards,

--Paul

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This 
list is maintained by Listserv. 

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.