Re: [802SEC] Motion to return 802.20 to individual voting rights
I was under the impression that the UC-EC turned into a pumpkin once
the 802.20 standard was approved, in which case, it isn't able to
make further decisions. So this should be a motion of the (regular) EC.
Or am I wrong?
At 03:25 19/06/2008, James Gilb wrote:
>I propose to make the following motion for EC email ballot. Please
>respond with any comments that you think will improve the motion.
>On 16 July 2007, the UC-EC voted to make voting for 802.20 to be
>based on entity affiliation. In June 2008, 802.20's first standard
>was approved by the IEEE SA.
>Moved to return the 802.20 working group to individual voting at the
>beginning of the July 2008 plenary meeting. Voting rights shall be
>calculated based on individual attendance records according to the
>802 LMSC policies and procedures.
>Because the original decision was from the UC-EC, it is my
>understanding that this will be a UC-EC ballot.
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
>reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.