Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] +++ 802 EC motion to allow consideration of 802.11 PARs in July



Approve.



At 22:49 20/06/2008, Klerer, Mark wrote:
>Approve
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Pat Thaler <pthaler@broadcom.com>
>To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>; 
>Klerer, Mark
>Sent: Fri Jun 20 14:33:08 2008
>Subject: RE: +++ 802 EC motion to allow consideration of 802.11 PARs in July
>
>+++++++ Corrected text of motion: +++++
>Dear Colleagues,
>
>This is a 10 day email ballot of the IEEE 802 EC. This ballot will close
>30 June 2008 (anywhere on Earth). Paul has delegated conduct of this
>ballot to me. Because this is a ballot to suspend the rules, Paul has
>ruled that it will require a vote of 2/3 of EC with voting rights
>members to pass.
>
>Motion:
>This motion is for the PARs:
><https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0716-00-0vht-below-6-ghz-p
>a>
>https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0716-00-0vht-below-6-ghz-pa
>r-nescom-form.doc
><https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0716-00-0vht-below-6-ghz-p
>ar-nescom-form.doc>
><https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0715-00-0vht-60-ghz-par-ne
>s>
>https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0715-00-0vht-60-ghz-par-nes
>com-form.doc
>which were to the EC circulated 2 days less than the required 30 days
>prior to the Opening Excecutive Committee meeting of the July 2008
>plenary.
>
>Moved to Suspend the rules to allow consideration of the 802.11 Below 6
>GHz PAR and the 802.11 60 GHz PAR  at the July 2008 closing EC meeting.
>
>Mover: Pat Thaler
>Seconder: Bruce Kraemer
>
>Regards,
>Pat Thaler
>
>Good catch Mark, I had intended to remove that because I decided it
>wasn't necessary - if a WG has a problem with the PARs it can use the
>comment process. And I think people should know whether the EC is going
>to allow the motion before the meeting.
>
>Note however that I disagree with your rationale. The 30 day in advance
>rule is to circulate to the EC reflector, not just the EC. That means
>that any member can see those announcements by checking the EC reflector
>30 days before the meeting. They don't need to depend on their chairs to
>circulate the information.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Klerer, Mark [mailto:mklerer@qualcomm.com]
>Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 2:17 PM
>To: Pat Thaler; STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>Subject: RE: +++ 802 EC motion to allow consideration of 802.11 PARs in
>July
>
>Why do we have the "except clause" for a WG objecting? Will the WG have
>to object by a simple majority vote? There is no requirement for each WG
>to see it 30 days in advance just for the EC. The individual WG chairs
>can than circulate that information. So I would not complicate the
>motion with that proviso.
>
>Anyway I will vote approve either way.
>
>Mark
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
>[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Pat Thaler
>Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 4:54 PM
>To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>Subject: +++ 802 EC motion to allow consideration of 802.11 PARs in July
>
>Dear Colleagues,
>
>This is a 10 day email ballot of the IEEE 802 EC. This ballot will close
>30 June 2008 (anywhere on Earth). Paul has delegated conduct of this
>ballot to me. Because this is a ballot to suspend the rules, Paul has
>ruled that it will require a vote of 2/3 of EC with voting rights
>members to pass.
>
>Motion:
>This motion is for the PARs:
><https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0716-00-0vht-below-6-ghz-p
>a>
>https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0716-00-0vht-below-6-ghz-pa
>r-nescom-form.doc
><https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0716-00-0vht-below-6-ghz-p
>ar-nescom-form.doc>
><https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0715-00-0vht-60-ghz-par-ne
>s>
>https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0715-00-0vht-60-ghz-par-nes
>com-form.doc
>which were to the EC circulated 2 days less than the required 30 days
>prior to the Opening Excecutive Committee meeting of the July 2008
>plenary.
>
>Moved to Suspend the rules to allow consideration of the 802.11 Below 6
>GHz PAR and the 802.11 60 GHz PAR  at the July 2008 closing EC meeting.
>
>Mover: Pat Thaler
>Seconder: Bruce Kraemer
>
>Regards,
>Pat Thaler
>
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email 
>reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.

Regards,
Tony

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.