Re: [802SEC] +++ 802 EC motion to allow consideration of 802.11 PARs in July - tallly so far
Ummm.... Pat, I don't think I get a vote on this motion.
-Bob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-
> SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Pat Thaler
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 7:06 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ 802 EC motion to allow consideration of
> 802.11 PARs in July - tallly so far
>
> Interim tally - I'm mostly sending this out to check that I got the
> list
> right. I think this is the first full EC vote after our new members
> from
> the March elections joined us.
>
> The tally so far:
> ----------------
> Voting:
> 1) Sherman - Approve
> 2) Thaler - Approve
> 3) Rigsbee -
> 4) O'Hara -
> 5) Gilb -
> 6) Jeffree - Approve
> 7) Law -
> 8) Kraemer - Approve
> 9) Heile - Approve
> 10) Marks -
> 11) Lemon - Approve
> 12) Lynch -
> 13) Shellhammer - Approve
> 14) Klerer - Approve
> 15) Gupta -
> 16) Stevenson -
>
> Non-voting:
> 1) Thompson
> 2) Nikolich
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
> [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Pat Thaler
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 2:33 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ 802 EC motion to allow consideration of
> 802.11
> PARs in July
>
> +++++++ Corrected text of motion: +++++
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> This is a 10 day email ballot of the IEEE 802 EC. This ballot will
> close
> 30 June 2008 (anywhere on Earth). Paul has delegated conduct of this
> ballot to me. Because this is a ballot to suspend the rules, Paul has
> ruled that it will require a vote of 2/3 of EC with voting rights
> members to pass.
>
> Motion:
> This motion is for the PARs:
>
<https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0716-00-0vht-below-6-ghz-
> p
> a>
> https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0716-00-0vht-below-6-ghz-
> pa
> r-nescom-form.doc
>
<https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0716-00-0vht-below-6-ghz-
> p
> ar-nescom-form.doc>
> <https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0715-00-0vht-60-ghz-par-
> ne
> s>
> https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0715-00-0vht-60-ghz-par-
> nes
> com-form.doc
> which were to the EC circulated 2 days less than the required 30 days
> prior to the Opening Excecutive Committee meeting of the July 2008
> plenary.
>
> Moved to Suspend the rules to allow consideration of the 802.11 Below
6
> GHz PAR and the 802.11 60 GHz PAR at the July 2008 closing EC
meeting.
>
> Mover: Pat Thaler
> Seconder: Bruce Kraemer
>
> Regards,
> Pat Thaler
>
> Good catch Mark, I had intended to remove that because I decided it
> wasn't necessary - if a WG has a problem with the PARs it can use the
> comment process. And I think people should know whether the EC is
going
> to allow the motion before the meeting.
>
> Note however that I disagree with your rationale. The 30 day in
advance
> rule is to circulate to the EC reflector, not just the EC. That means
> that any member can see those announcements by checking the EC
> reflector
> 30 days before the meeting. They don't need to depend on their chairs
> to
> circulate the information.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Klerer, Mark [mailto:mklerer@qualcomm.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 2:17 PM
> To: Pat Thaler; STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: RE: +++ 802 EC motion to allow consideration of 802.11 PARs
in
> July
>
> Why do we have the "except clause" for a WG objecting? Will the WG
have
> to object by a simple majority vote? There is no requirement for each
> WG
> to see it 30 days in advance just for the EC. The individual WG chairs
> can than circulate that information. So I would not complicate the
> motion with that proviso.
>
> Anyway I will vote approve either way.
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
> [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Pat Thaler
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 4:54 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: +++ 802 EC motion to allow consideration of 802.11 PARs in
> July
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> This is a 10 day email ballot of the IEEE 802 EC. This ballot will
> close
> 30 June 2008 (anywhere on Earth). Paul has delegated conduct of this
> ballot to me. Because this is a ballot to suspend the rules, Paul has
> ruled that it will require a vote of 2/3 of EC with voting rights
> members to pass.
>
> Motion:
> This motion is for the PARs:
>
<https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0716-00-0vht-below-6-ghz-
> p
> a>
> https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0716-00-0vht-below-6-ghz-
> pa
> r-nescom-form.doc
>
<https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0716-00-0vht-below-6-ghz-
> p
> ar-nescom-form.doc>
> <https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0715-00-0vht-60-ghz-par-
> ne
> s>
> https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-08-0715-00-0vht-60-ghz-par-
> nes
> com-form.doc
> which were to the EC circulated 2 days less than the required 30 days
> prior to the Opening Excecutive Committee meeting of the July 2008
> plenary.
>
> Moved to Suspend the rules to allow consideration of the 802.11 Below
6
> GHz PAR and the 802.11 60 GHz PAR at the July 2008 closing EC
meeting.
>
> Mover: Pat Thaler
> Seconder: Bruce Kraemer
>
> Regards,
> Pat Thaler
>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.