Re: [802SEC] Clause 19 Report regarding P802.21/D13 to RevCom
In review of the Tony Jeffree 1/2 [
] I note that Tony is a Disapprove voter and has marked this comment as
Must Be Satisfied. I further note that the response doesn't state that the
comment is out of scope due to being related to unchanged text - nor does
it state that the comment is a restatement of a previous comment - instead
the response simply provides a rebuttal. Based on this you appear to me to
be treating this comment as a new valid Disapprove comments - is this
I did try to find the comments and response from the previous
recirculations on the IEEE 802.21 web site but was unable to find them so
I'm unable to see what comment #1 on recirculation #4 stated.
***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
<STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> wrote on 15/08/2008 19:45:43:
> Dear EC Colleagues:
> I am reporting on the status of P802.21/D13.0, as per the Clause 19
> Conditional Approval granted on 18 July, 2008.
> The Sponsor Ballot Recirculation-6, including the review of
> P802.21/D13.0 ran from 30 July, 2008 - 14 August, 2008.
> The final vote tally is: 126/5/11
> The Approval Ratio is 96.18% and the Return Ratio is 86%.
> The conditions have been met.
> ? No New Disapprove votes were received during this recirculation
> ? Total of 12 comments were submitted. 7 of these are from
> Disapprove voters.
> ? No Technical changes are required as a result of these comments
> ? No new valid Disapprove comments on new issues
> The complete report is available at:
> Accordingly, I shall be forwarding P802.21 to RevCom.
> Best Regards,
> Vivek Gupta
> Chair, IEEE 802.21
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This list is maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.