Re: [802SEC] WG P&P
There are some obvious places in the document where changes are needed - the most glaring
apart from the sections you cite below is in 6.2 where it seems to require that if you
hold officer elections during a meeting, then the election has to last 14 days (so
presumably the meeting has to last 14 days), but apart from fixing the bugs it seems like
a plausible starting point. Also worth noting that the wording of 6.2 means that we would
have to open nominations for officer posts 14 days before we hold the election, even if we
do this at a meeting, which doesn't match some WGs' current practice.
I presume the master plan here is still to have one set of WG P&P that cover all WGs in
802, and that any WG that wants to add to them can then do their own thing?
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On
Behalf Of Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)
Sent: 08 June 2009 04:11
Subject: [802SEC] WG P&P
I've been actively editing a draft WG P&P. I'm starting to get into more difficult stuff,
so I thought I would solicit a few opinions....
The baseline WG P&P provided by AudCom (attached) often allows us to modify the rules.
Key areas where modifications are possible are:
Meetings (10 and part of 7.2)
The rules presented there are generally simpler than our own. I could force fit our
existing rules into the WG P&P format (I will force the approval rate to ¾ on some votes)
but I'm inclined to let much of the default text stand instead of our current rules.
What do people think?
Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
BAE Systems - Electronics, Intelligence, & Support (EI&S)
Office: +1 973.633.6344
Cell: +1 973.229.9520
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is
maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
- [802SEC] WG P&P
- From: "Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)" <matthew.sherman@BAESYSTEMS.COM>