|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
All, I am almost done with the drafting on the WG P&P. Creation of the WG P&P will impact both the LMSC P&P and the LMSC OM. So their will be two ballots: One to amend the LMSC P&P (effective Jan 1 2010) One to amend the LMSC OM and create the WG P&P (effective upon completion of the ballot) The biggest question at the moment concerns voting rules. Clause 9 of the WG P&P contains the voting rules, and they are considerably different from what we currently use. We could use the out of saying 'we need to be compliant with Sponsor Rules' and simply replace Clause 9 with subclause 22.214.171.124 of the LMSC OM. However I have been cautioned against making our rules vary too much from the AudCom baseline. I can try and reformat our rules to the baseline, but even then I feel they will be fairly divergent. Thoughts / preferences? Thanks! Mat Matthew Sherman, Ph.D. Engineering Fellow BAE Systems - Electronics, Intelligence, & Support (EI&S) Office: +1 973.633.6344 Cell: +1 973.229.9520 email: email@example.com ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
090620 LMSC_OM_approved_081114modified for WG P&P.doc
Description: 090620 LMSC_OM_approved_081114modified for WG P&P.doc
090620 Draft IEEE 802 WG_PandP.doc
Description: 090620 Draft IEEE 802 WG_PandP.doc