Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] +++ EC vote on IEEE P802.3az RevCom submittal



Approve.

Roger


On 2010/09/02, at 12:51 PM, Law, David wrote:

> Dear EC members,
> 
> Further to the email below the IEEE P802.3az Energy-efficient Ethernet 3rd sponsor recirculation ballot closed at 11:59PM on 29th August with no new negatives. The summary ballot results are as follows:
> 
> 127 voters
> 103 affirmative votes
> 1   negative votes with comments
> 0   negative votes without comments
> 6   abstention votes
> 
> 86% returned
> 5%  abstention
> 99% affirmative
> 
> We received only one comment - it was an editorial coordination comment that reads 'This draft meets all editorial requirements'. 
> 
> I have provided the full results in the attached file.
> 
> Based on the above, and since I didn't request conditional approval in July, Paul has delegated to me the conduct of the EC electronic ballot on the motion below.
> 
> 
> Motion
> ======
> 
> The EC approves the IEEE P802.3az submittal remaining on the September 2010 RevCom agenda.
> 
> Move:    David Law
> Second:  Bruce Kraemer
> 
> Start of ballot: Thursday 2nd September 
> Close of ballot: Sunday 12th September, 11:59PM AOE
> 
> Early close: As required in subclause 4.1.2.2 'Electronic Balloting' of the IEEE project 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC) Operations Manual, this is notice that, to ensure the release is provided in a timely manner, this ballot may close early once sufficient responses are received to clearly decide a matter.
> 
> Best regards,
>  David Law
> 
> 
> 
> Paul Nikolich wrote:
>> Dear EC members,
>> 
>> Per out process which states a WG Chair may submit a draft to RevCom 
>> without EC approval '.. provided that the Sponsor Chair first notifies 
>> the Sponsor email reflector that, in the Chair's view based on the 
>> complete RevCom package, there is a reasonable expectation that the 
>> submittal will be approved by the Sponsor before the RevCom meeting.'.
>> 
>> David Law has requested I review the status of the 802.3az project in 
>> preparation for RevCom review.  I have determined there is a 
>> reasonable expectation the attached submittal will be approved by the 
>> EC before the next RevCom meeting and, via this email, am notifying the EC as such.
>> See the details below.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> --Paul
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Law, David" <dlaw@hp.com>
>> To: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@att.net>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 12:12 PM
>> Subject: RE: IEEE P802.3az submittal to RevCom
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Paul,
>> 
>> The 2nd recirculation ballot on IEEE P802.3az/D3.2 closed with the 
>> following results:
>> 
>> 96 affirmative votes
>> 5 negative votes with comments
>> 0 negative votes without comments
>> 6 abstention votes
>> 
>> 84% returned
>> 5% abstention
>> 95% affirmative
>> 
>> A total of 5 comments were submitted but three of them were withdrawn 
>> prior to the comment resolution meeting. The meeting took place on 
>> Thursday 12th August and no changes were made to the IEEE 
>> P802.3az/D3.2 draft. The two remaining comments however are unresolved 
>> and as they are associated with a negative vote require recirculation.
>> 
>> The 3rd recirculation ballot on IEEE P802.3az opened on Friday 13th 
>> August and will close on Sunday 29th August. Based on the email 
>> exchange below I would like to proceed to submit IEEE P802.3az to 
>> RevCom in order to meet the 20th August submittal deadline. Once the 
>> recirculation is complete I will perform an EC email ballot to confirm 
>> that the submittal package remain on the September RevCom agenda.
>> 
>> The process outlined in Clause 14 states I may submit to RevCom 
>> without EC approval '.. provided that the Sponsor Chair first notifies 
>> the Sponsor email reflector that, in the Chair's view based on the 
>> complete RevCom package, there is a reasonable expectation that the 
>> submittal will be approved by the Sponsor before the RevCom meeting.'. 
>> I have therefore attached the complete RevCom package I propose to submit.
>> 
>> Since the scope of the current 3rd recirculation is limited to two 
>> unresolved comments I hope that you agree with me that when the 3rd 
>> recirculation ballot closes and I perform the EC email ballot the 
>> submittal will be approved by the EC.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> David
>> ----------
>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  
>> This list is maintained by Listserv.
> 
> 
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.
> <802.3az_RevCom.pdf>

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.