Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Sponsor ballot authorization for P802.1Qaz



Approve.

Roger

On 2010/09/22, at 01:46 AM, Tony Jeffree wrote:

> Colleauges -
> 
> Results to date are as follows:
> 
> Vote categories:         APP    DIS    ABS    DNV
> --------------------------------------------------
> 1) VC Pat Thaler           APP
> 2) VC Mat Sherman      APP
> 3) TR John Hawkins                                       DNV
> 4) RS James Gilb         APP
> 5) ES Jon Rosdahl                                         DNV
> 6) 01 Tony Jeffree          APP
> 7) 03 David Law            APP
> 8) 11 Bruce Kraemer     APP
> 9) 15 Bob Heile            APP
> 0) 16 Roger Marks                                         DNV
> 1) 17 John Lemon                                          DNV
> 2) 18 Mike Lynch         APP
> 3) 19 Steve Shellhammer  APP
> 4) 20 Mark Klerer         APP
> 5) 21 Subir Das           APP
> 6) 22 Apurva Mody        APP
> 7) 23 Geoff Thompson    APP
> 8) ME Buzz Rigsbee       non-voting
> 9) CH Paul Nikolich        non-voting
> ---------------------------------------------------
> 17 TOTALS        result  13     00      00     4
> 
> As the Approve count is now well over 50%, it is clear that this motion has
> received "...sufficient responses ...to clearly decide the matter", so this
> ballot has now closed and the motion has passed.
> 
> Many thanks to all for the rapid responses.
> 
> Regards,
> Tony
> 
> 
> On 21 September 2010 16:28, Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>> I notice that I didn't formulate the early close condition quite right...
>> 
>> "Early close: As required in subclause 4.1.2.2 'Electronic Balloting' of
>> the IEEE project 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC) Operations Manual,
>> this is notice that, to ensure the Sponsor ballot is started in a timely
>> manner, this ballot may close early once sufficient responses are received
>> to clearly decide the matter."
>> 
>> So, the ballot opens 21st September and will close on the 3rd October, or
>> once sufficient responses are received to show a majority for or against,
>> whichever is sooner.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tony
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 21 September 2010 15:35, Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>>> All -
>>> 
>>> Paul has authorized me to run an email ballot on the following motion:
>>> 
>>> "EC approves forwarding of P802.1Qaz to Sponsor ballot.
>>> 
>>> Moved:Jeffree
>>> Second: Thaler"
>>> 
>>> Closing date for the ballot will be Sunday 3rd October, or the date that
>>> all voting members of the EC have responded, whichever is earlier.
>>> 
>>> I approve the motion.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Tony
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 21 September 2010 13:33, Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Paul -
>>>> 
>>>> We have a pretty clean result for the latest P802.1Qaz recirculation and
>>>> I would like to run an EC email ballot on a motion to allow it to be
>>>> forwarded to Sponsor ballot. Pat will second. The recirc results are:
>>>> 
>>>> We had no new disapprove votes and no changes to the document from the
>>>> recirculation.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Approve:             27
>>>> 
>>>> Disapprove:        1
>>>> 
>>>> Approve %:        96%
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Abstain:               32
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Responding:       60
>>>> 
>>>> Voters:                 96
>>>> 
>>>> Response %:      62%
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The disapprove voter is Anoop Ghanwani who has indicated that he is
>>>> satisfied with the resolution of all but one of his comments.  The comment
>>>> on which he is maintaining his disapprove vote is:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> *Cl **38        **SC **38.5.4                **P **64         **L
>>>>             # *99
>>>> 
>>>> *Comment Type **TR*
>>>> 
>>>> This clause needs to have an associated PFC Defense mechanism. The need
>>>> for this is
>>>> 
>>>> covered in: az-ghanwani-pfc-defense-0909-v02.pdf.
>>>> 
>>>> *SuggestedRemedy*
>>>> 
>>>> Add a defense mechanism for PFC. The mechanism would be similar to that
>>>> specified for
>>>> 
>>>> CN.
>>>> 
>>>> REJECT. Group consensus has been that this is not a solution that DCB
>>>> wishes to persue.
>>>> 
>>>> This has not changed from pervious ballots.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The file mentioned in the comment is available at:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2009/az-ghanwani-pfc-defense-0909-v02.pdf
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The motion would be:
>>>> 
>>>> "EC approves forwarding of P802.1Qaz to Sponsor ballot.
>>>> 
>>>> Moved:Jeffree
>>>> 
>>>> Second: Thaler"
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Tony
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.