Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] 802 Chair report for opening EC meeting is attached



Bob -

We don't have a reaffirmation in process, so on the basis of what Kathryn
has said, I believe we are good to go till 2018.

Regards,
Tony


On 8 November 2011 20:07, Grow, Bob <bob.grow@intel.com> wrote:

> If she got the information from Dave Ringle, then it would be good, as
> Dave is the one that compiles the administrative withdrawal list.  But, if
> you have a reaffirmation in ballot, Kathryn’s response is in disagreement
> with what the Reaffirmation Ad Hoc will recommend to ProCom for transition.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> *10. What will happen to stabilizations or reaffirmations in ballot on 1
> January 2012 when this new policy is implemented?*
>
> Any reaffirmation or stabilization ballot that is in process on 1 January
> 2012 will need to complete in time for submittal to the Standards Review
> Committee (RevCom) of the IEEE‐SASB for its December 2012 meeting. All
> ongoing reaffirmation ballots will be cancelled after 4 December 2012 and
> any related standard will be subject to the timelines in FAQ#9. No
> reaffirmation/stabilization ballots can be initiated after 31 December 2011.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> So, if you are in ballot and just stop recirculation ballots, you can fall
> back to the 2018 completion of a revision date (assuming ProCom/SASB accept
> the implementation in the proposed FAQ.****
>
> ** **
>
> --Bob****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* tonyjeffree@googlemail.com [mailto:tonyjeffree@googlemail.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Tony Jeffree
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 08, 2011 11:55 AM
> *To:* Grow, Bob
> *Cc:* STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [802SEC] 802 Chair report for opening EC meeting is
> attached****
>
> ** **
>
> Bob -
>
> I quote Kathryn Bennet's email to me a couple of weeks ago:
>
> Hi Tony.  I just got official word that standards due to expire 12/31/2001
> will be extended to 2018.  By then, the standard must be revised to stay
> alive.  Do you want to continue with the reaff and therefore push the next
> action date out to 2021?  Or, I can cancel the reaff.  Whichever is best
> for you.  I apologize for the confusion.  -Kathryn
>
> Regards,
> Tony
>
> ****
>
> On 8 November 2011 19:45, Grow, Bob <bob.grow@intel.com> wrote:****
>
> Tony:
>
> The key date for the change in maintenance cycles is 1 January 2012.
>  Standards withdrawn prior to that date will still be withdrawn, therefore,
> a standard on the December 2011 administrative withdrawal list voted on by
> the SASB would most likely be withdrawn.  Under the new rules, it is clear
> that a withdrawn standard can be returned to active status via a revision
> project.  Any project in ballot on 1 January 2012 must complete balloting.
>  A standard not withdrawn this year, I expect to be covered by the below
> implementation detail (revision must be completed by):
>
> 9.  What will happen to standards that have been reaffirmed or stabilized
> prior to the policy going into effect?
>
> Standards that have been reaffirmed or stabilized prior to 1 January 2012
> will be transitioned into the new maintenance timeline. The Sponsor of the
> standard will be required to revise the standard according to the latest of
> the following dates:
>     ‐ By 31 December 2018
>     ‐ Within 10 years of initial approval
>     ‐ Within 10 years from the last maintenance action (revision,
> reaffirmation or stabilization)
>
> If no action is taken, the standard will be transferred to inactive‐reserved
> status.
>
> --Bob****
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:
> STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Tony Jeffree
> Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 2:23 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] 802 Chair report for opening EC meeting is attached
>
> Paul -
>
> 802.1AE isn't due for any maintenance action until 2017 apparently, under
> the new policy.
>
> Regards,
> Tony
>
>
> On 6 November 2011 22:14, Paul Nikolich <paul.nikolich@att.net> wrote:
>
> > James,
> >
> > Attached is my report for the opening EC meeting which provides
> > information on some of the consent agenda items.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --Paul
> >
> > ----------
> > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>  This
> > list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This
> list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This
> list is maintained by Listserv.****
>
> ** **
>

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.