Re: [802SEC] Approval of future plenary locations
Then I do not have any authority to pay any of the expenses arising from
the San Diego meeting.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Roger Marks <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I disagree with your view, and I oppose any further balloting.
> To declare positively or firmly; maintain to be true.
> To support or uphold the validity of; confirm.
> To declare solemnly and formally but not under oath.
> If we have positively declared approval, then we're done.
> On 2012/06/05, at 04:39 PM, Clint Chaplin wrote:
> > Unfortunately, the motion today was to affirm approval. If approval
> > happened in the first place, you cannot affirm it.
> > Paul, can I run a letter ballot to approve San Diego as the location of
> > July 2012 802 plenary session?
> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:04 AM, James P. K. Gilb <email@example.com> wrote:
> >> All
> >> I searched the opening and closing minutes from 2005-2010 and there was
> >> record that the IEEE 802 LMSC approved San Diego as the venue for the
> >> 2012 plenary, hence it is good that we approved on our conference call.
> >> James Gilb
> >> ----------
> >> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> >> list is maintained by Listserv.
> > --
> > Clint (JOATMON) Chaplin
> > Principal Engineer
> > Standards & Technology Enabling
> > Advanced Technology Lab
> > Samsung Electronics US R&D Center
> > ----------
> > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This list is maintained by Listserv.
Clint (JOATMON) Chaplin
Standards & Technology Enabling
Advanced Technology Lab
Samsung Electronics US R&D Center
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.