Re: [802SEC] Rules issue on Procedure for PARs
I think we should remove it.
If we don't, then probably the best place to track it is to add it to
the 5C, which I have porposed that we update in November.
On 10/12/2012 04:51 PM, Pat Thaler wrote:
In working on text for the RFC on how IEEE and IETF work together, I
noticed that the second paragraph of 11.2 of the Operations Manual
(the subclause on 802 approval of PARs) says that PARs are to be
accompanied by "a work plan for the development of managed object
definitions, either as part of the PAR or as part of an additional
I haven't seen any PARs accompanied by such a work plan (beyond some
PARs having the words "managed objects" in their scope). Looking at
recently approved PARs, there are PARs that don't include even that.
Should we remove this requirement since we aren't enforcing it?
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.