Re: [802SEC] Change in WG treasury signatory requirements in WG P&P
I believe that it is an SA requirement that the Sponsor Chair be on any
bank account within his sponsorship.
(Actually, that seems like a perfectly reasonable requirement to me.)
Perhaps one of my colleagues who is a little more up to date on
governance and SA requirements can chime in on this.
Therefore, if only one signature is to be added, it should be the chair.
I would expect that if the occasion arises that either the chair or the
treasurer has to get into a WG bank account it is likely to be a
one-time event to take over the account. For an event of that
magnitude, we are better having the chair be in on it.
Therefore, I will oppose any change to the P&P that puts anyone in 802
outside the WG onto the account if it does not include the 802 Chair.
On 1910//12 3:53 PM, James P. K. Gilb wrote:
If any of the changes are to go into the P&P, may I kindly suggest
that we make them as part of the new P&P in November?
On 10/19/2012 02:45 PM, Clint Chaplin wrote:
One of my self-assigned tasks was to review all P&Ps, manuals, and
for any and all rules pertaining to my position. One of the rules I
across was a requirement in the WG P&Ps that all WG bank accounts add
Sponsor Chair as a signatory.
My suggestion is that we require either the Sponsor Chair or the Sponsor
Treasurer to be added as a signatory on all WG bank accounts. This
to me, makes sense in that the Sponsor Treasurer is explicitly tasked
overseeing all WG treasurers.
I will be proposing modified text at some point to implement this
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.