Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Comments received on 802.15.4q

   There was comments from 802.11 that were in the file I posted to the Reflector.
I acknowledge my error in the cover letter not pointing out that it was in the referenced document.
Here are the comments from doc 11-12-1223r0 that was posted and sent to the SEC reflector at 3:46pm CT.
802.11 comments to 802.15.4q:
5C ? 3a ? Suggests that some existing 15.4 devices can operate with coin cell batteries.  This would imply that the existing standard is sufficient for building compliant devices operating with coin cell batteries.

Q: Why do you need a new Standard?  How is it ?unique? from the existing standard?

5C ? 3a seems to infer that the problem being solved is related  to pulse current, while 3b suggests the problem is average current.

Q: What is the actual problem?
As you can see, it is a couple of clarification questions that the group would like a response on.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Heile" <>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 7:35 PM
Subject: [802SEC] Comments received on 802.15.4q

> All-
> I received a comment from Paul Nikolich on 15.4q
> Regards
> Bob
> Bob Heile, Ph.D
> Chairman, ZigBee Alliance
> Chair, IEEE 802.15 Working Group on Wireless Personal Area Networks
> Co-Chair IEEE P2030 Task Force 3 on Smartgrid Communications
> 11 Robert Toner Blvd
> Suite 5-301
> North Attleboro, MA  02763   USA
> Mobile: +1-781-929-4832
> email:
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.