Re: [802SEC] Proposed compatibility requirement for CSD/5C
I think that this wording is ok up to the point of the "exception"
I think that that paragraph is not necessary.
----- Original Message -----
From: "James P. K. Gilb" <email@example.com>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 8:03 AM
Subject: [802SEC] Proposed compatibility requirement for CSD/5C
Based on feedback, I have some updated wording to consider for the
compatibility requirement for the CSD/5C. This would replace the existing
All IEEE 802 standards should be in conformance with IEEE Std 802, IEEE
802.1D, and IEEE 802.1Q. If any variances in conformance emerge, they
shall be thoroughly disclosed and reviewed with IEEE 802.1 Working Group
prior to submitting a PAR to the Sponsor.
a) Will the proposed standard comply with IEEE Std 802, IEEE Std 802.1D
and IEEE Std 802.1Q?
b) If the answer to a) is no, supply the response from the IEEE 802.1
An exception to this procedure is made for variances that occur due to the
use of EUI-64 addresses in proposed standards that require EUI-64
addresses to maintain backward compatibility with existing IEEE 802
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
list is maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.