|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
Max / Tony,
Then I suggest we add a second item.
I personally believe we should discuss how to enable getting groups working together closer or at least being better informed of each other’s efforts.
We did away with the 802 opening plenary. Perhaps we should consider adding a tutorial once a year where we get all of the WG’s to give updates? From my own personal experience, I am reaching out to 802.11 for input, as well as been asked to go and talk with other groups regarding the industry connections vehicle.
I am not really happy with the title of the OmniRAN related topic, as mentioned below and would like to second Tony's proposal. I came up with the refined title to talk about cooperation with other WGs specific in the scope of the OmniRAN PAR. I do not see much correlation with the 400G Study Group, but John might be able to explain, why both cases would fit/complement each other.
I would like to suggest leaving the agenda item on co-operation between WGs as is, and using OmniRAN as a case study, as well as the 400G Study Group as another case study. I am happy to share the time with Max.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Tony Jeffree
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 11:02 PM
To: Stephens, Adrian P
Subject: Re: [802SEC] 802 November workshop - 16 Nov 2013
A few points:
"Definitions of Mesh and Bridging" sounds to me like a technical topic, and as such, is not an appropriate topic for an EC offsite. Please remove this from the agenda.
I believe that where we ended up in our offline discussion regarding OmniRAN was Max's suggestion that the topic should be "Cooperation and contributions of the other WGs in the 802.1-OmniRAN project". Please change that agenda item accordingly.
I would like to add 2 topics to the agenda:
- Adherence to "Procedure for PARs"
- Term limits for Sponsor officers
On 28 August 2013 11:18, Stephens, Adrian P <Adrian.P.Stephens@intel.com> wrote:
The agenda items collected so far for the EC workshop are as follows:
Review Goals, Objectives and Constraints for Workshop
Review actions from previous meeting
How much background info in a PAR
Looking for an owner for this topic
Definitions of mesh and bridging
Next Gen publishing system
Kim Breitfelder or Walter Pienciak
802 Marketing for 2014
John asked for this
IEEE-SA service levels
Jon / Pat
Jon or Pat has agreed to this
IEEE-SA service levels for starting ballots (i.e. introduced delays) (Might be part of a general SA tools discussion)
Include in general tools discussion
Non-USA meetings services requirements
Take feedback on Geneva meeting and identify any issues
Review existing requirements and discuss if they are adequate
Pat / Jon
Jon or Pat has agreed to this
How does latest understanding of OMNIRAN fit into 802 architecture?
What is the opportunity/impact on WGs?
Can only hold this item if 802.1 has come to agreement on architectural fit.
Technical interchange between WGs
We have tutorials. But should there be a way of encouraging increased technical interchange between each others' groups.
looking for a volunteer
Review Actions from this meeting
There is room for a couple of additional substantial topics for discussion. If you have an idea for an agenda
item, or wish to volunteer, please let me know asap.
Adrian P STEPHENS
Tel: +1 (408) 2397485 (mobile, USA)
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47