Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Comments from 802.16 Working Group regarding 802-REV PAR extension request

Dear Harry -

We are aware that the current PAR Scope does not exactly match the document's Scope subclause; however, as the document does not exceed the PAR scope, then this is not a problem for the progression of the project. Also, changing the PAR at this stage, when the document is under Sponsor ballot, is problematic, because it would require us to re-form the Sponsor ballot group, and in turn, that would require cancelling the existing ballot and starting a new Sponsor ballot. There is absolutely no point in doing that, so we don't intend to change the PAR wording.

In any event, as this is a PAR extension request, not a PAR modification request, there is no opportunity to make changes to the rest of the PAR detail as part of this process; the extension request can only request changes to the end date, so actually this is not an "opportunity to align the PAR scope with the draft scope" at all.


On 12 November 2013 21:36, HARRY BIMS <> wrote:
Dear Tony,

The 802.16 Working Group has prepared comments regarding the 802-REV PAR extension request under consideration.  I have posted our feedback on the following link:


Harry Bims
802.16 Working Group Vice Char

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.