|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
The issue I have with this is that the purpose of an 802 WG’s Study Group is to create a PAR (and CSD). This is not a study group for that purpose, but for a bunch of other admirable purposes.
It is reasonable for a WG’s Study Group to be able to write a PAR and CSD in 6 months, and the IEEE-SA rules mention that figure. I’m not sure it is reasonable for the group this proposes to be limited the same way. The obvious rejoinder is that I was there and voted to approve the study group, so I should have said my piece then. Nevertheless, I believe we should discuss at the next EC meeting the purpose of this group and determine whether it fits within the definition of a WG’s study group, or needs to be called (and follow the rules for) something else.
Adrian P STEPHENS
Tel: +44 (1793) 404825 (office)
Tel: +1 (408) 2397485 (mobile, USA)
At the November Plenary the EC approved formation of the 802.19 study group on Coexistence in Unlicensed Bands (CUB). At the time we had not prepared a press release. We have now done that.
Before running an electronic ballot on this I would like to give the EC a few days to look it over and see if there are any editorial comments on the draft.
Please take a few minutes to look this over and send me any comments you might have. This has already been reviewed and edited by the IEEE staff.
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.