|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
Thanks. I have no problem dropping “co-channel.”
I vote approve.
I do have the following suggestion for a change:
· Delete “co-channel” in “mitigating co-channel interference” (my emphasis). I’m not sure the group should so limited. Adjacent channel is important. Even front-end compression from adjacent band (LTE/802.11) is known to be important. And given channels that only partly overlap the meaning of “co-channel” is unclear.
Adrian P STEPHENS
Tel: +44 (1793) 404825 (office)
Tel: +1 (408) 2397485 (mobile, USA)
Dear EC Members,
Happy New Year!
Paul has delegated the conduct of the EC electronic ballot on the following motion to me. To enable this press release to be issued as soon as possible I'm announcing the possibility of an 'early close' to this ballot (see below).
Approve the attached press release on the formation of the Coexistence in Unlicensed Bands Study Group (document “IEEE_802-19_Study_Group_PR_Draft_v3_5JAN15”).
Move: Steve Shellhammer
Second: Apurva Mody
Start of ballot: Monday January 5, 2015
Close of ballot: Thursday January 15, 2015, 11:59PM AOE
Early close: As required in subclause 4.1.2 'Voting rules' of the IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC) Operations Manual, this is notice that, to ensure the release is provided in a timely manner, this ballot may close early once sufficient responses are received to clearly decide a matter.
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.