|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
Paul and Adrian,
Here are a few corrections, based on my memory of events.
March 10. 802.11 Regulatory Standing Committee Meeting
The minutes are missing the statement from the chair that he is not going to have the standing committee vote on approval of the Tiger Team Technical Report.
March 11. 802.11 WG minutes
“28.2.20. Chair: This is a procedural motion (50%), as the motion states that the document will go to IEEE 802.18.” is missing the final words of the chair. His statement was actually,
“28.2.20. Chair: This is a procedural motion (50%), as the motion states that the document will go to IEEE 802.18, since this will be a technical motion in 802.18 where 75% approval is required.”
March 12. 802.18 Meeting
The minutes are missing that statement from the chair that this is a procedural motion, though several of us in the meeting stated that our opinion that this was a technical motion.
Dear EC members,
Adrian and I have collaborated on creating a timeline (https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/15/ec-15-0029-00-00EC-dsrc-tiger-team-timeline.docx). The objective of this effort is capture the procedural steps taken by 802 in an easy-to-follow document on how 802 arrived at the current state regarding the completion of the 802.11 Regulatory Standing Committee DSRC Tiger Team ad hoc activities.
Please review, correct errors and suggest enhancements. It is important that we have an accurate context in which to make a decision on this pending matter.
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.