Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] 802.11 Regulatory Standing Committee DSRC Tiger Team ad hoc timeline

All

From what I have been told, what the EC should approve is as follows:
----------------------------
The IEEE 802 EC would like to state that while IEEE 802 has no consensus regarding an answer to the question, IEEE 802 would like to state the following: 1) IEEE 802 participants met in a Tiger Team with DSRC representatives to discuss the issue. 2) While there was a good exchange of ideas, the group was unable to reach consensus. 3) IEEE 802 EC would like to report that participants discussed various issues, as outlined in http://mentor.ieee.org/... but that we can take no position on the issue before the FCC. 4) IEEE 802 encourages similar discussions and efforts for consensus in the future regarding regulatory matters. 

Thanks
Chair of IEEE 802
----------------------------
I can support sending that letter to the FCC. Anything else would misrepresent the consensus of IEEE 802 (from what I have been told). 

IMHO.

James Gilb

On 04/02/2015 12:34 PM, John Kenney wrote:

Hi Paul and Adrian,

Thanks for the opportunity to comment on the timeline.

I suggest that for the period Dec. 2014 to March 2015 we add some
detail concerning the process that produced the Tiger Team final report and
the Tiger Team online poll.

These documents demonstrate that both the report and the voting results
were developed through an open and deliberative process. Poll questions
were edited over several hours of Tiger Team teleconferences in December
and January.  Final report comments were resolved over several hours
of Tiger Team teleconferences in February and March.

*Date of posting of each revision of draft Tiger Team final report: DCN
11-14-1596 (doc)*
revision 00 posted Dec. 12, 2014
revision 01 posted Jan. 30, 2015
revision 02 posted Feb. 20, 2015
revision 03 posted Mar 06, 2015
revision 04 posted Mar 09, 2015

*Date of posting of clean Tiger Team final report: DCN 11-15-0347 (pdf)*
March 09, 2015

*Date of posting of each revision of consolidated comment spreadsheet: DCN
11-15-0175 (xls)*
revision 00 posted Jan. 15, 2015
revision 01 posted Jan. 29, 2015
revision 02 posted Feb. 20, 2015
revision 03 posted Feb. 27, 2015
revision 04 posted Mar 06, 2015
revision 05 posted Mar 09, 2015

*Comment resolution teleconference dates (60 to 90 minutes each):*
Feb. 6, Feb. 20, Feb. 27 and March 6, 2015.

*Tiger Team voting:*

    - Straw Poll final questions: posted Jan 30, 2015

    https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-0240-00-0reg-dsrc-coex-tt-final-report-straw-poll-questions.ppt

    - Eligible voter list and Tiger Team attendance: posted Jan. 30, 2015

    https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-0183-02-0reg-dsrc-coexistence-tt-attendance.xls

    - Online Survey Period: Feb. 9 to Feb. 23, 2015

    - Overview of results: posted Feb. 27, 2015

    https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-0288-00-0reg-overview-of-dsrc-coex-tt-straw-poll-results.ppt

    - Sorted comments: posted March 8, 2015

    https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-0352-01-0reg-dsrc-tiger-team-straw-poll-comments-sorted.xlsx

I hope the EC voters find this information useful.

Best Regards,
John Kenney




On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Shellhammer, Steve <
sshellha@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:


  Paul and Adrian,



                Here are a few corrections, based on my memory of events.



*March 10. 802.11 Regulatory Standing Committee Meeting*

The minutes are missing the statement from the chair that he is not going
to have the standing committee vote on approval of the Tiger Team Technical
Report.



*March 11. 802.11 WG minutes*

“28.2.20. Chair: This is a procedural motion (50%), as the motion states
that the document will go to IEEE 802.18.” is missing the final words of
the chair.  His statement was actually,



“28.2.20. Chair: This is a procedural motion (50%), as the motion states
that the document will go to IEEE 802.18, since this will be a technical
motion in 802.18 where 75% approval is required.”



*March 12. 802.18 Meeting*

The minutes are missing that statement from the chair that this is a
procedural motion, though several of us in the meeting stated that our
opinion that this was a technical motion.



Regards,

Steve



*From:* ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:
STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] *On Behalf Of *Paul Nikolich
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 01, 2015 8:28 AM
*To:* STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* [802SEC] 802.11 Regulatory Standing Committee DSRC Tiger Team
ad hoc timeline



Dear EC members,



Adrian and I have collaborated on creating a timeline (
https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/15/ec-15-0029-00-00EC-dsrc-tiger-team-timeline.docx).
The objective of this effort is capture the procedural steps taken by
802 in an easy-to-follow document on how 802 arrived at the current state
regarding the completion of the 802.11 Regulatory Standing Committee DSRC
Tiger Team ad hoc activities.



Please review, correct errors and suggest enhancements.  It is important
that we have an accurate context in which to make a decision on this
pending matter.



Regards,



--Paul

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
  ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.







----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.