Do you want the restriction that the liaison must be a voting member of the Sponsor? (To me that says a voting member of the EC, pretty much excluding the technical experts working on transportation relevant 802 projects.)
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
Dear EC members,
I received the attached request to establish a liaison with the IEEE Standards Activity Standards Board Standards Coordinating Committee 42 on Transportation. In case you didn't know, I am the Computer Society Designated Representative to SCC 42, in that capacity I support the request. If you have any questions, please let me and the SCC 42 chair, Yu Yuan (email@example.com
) know. If there are no objections within the next week, I will most likely ask for a motion to approve the liaison and conduct an EC email ballot on the matter.
------ Forwarded Message ------
Sent: 6/2/2015 2:24:26 PM
Subject: Request to establish liaisons between IEEE SCC42 (SASB/SCC42) and IEEE 802 LMSC (C/LM)
On behalf of IEEE SCC42, I am writing to request your kind consideration with regard to establishing liaisons between IEEE SCC42 and IEEE 802 LMSC. Please kindly review the attached draft agreement. If IEEE 802 LMSC agrees with the content of the agreement, I'll send you a signed copy so that you can countersign it on behalf of IEEE 802 LMSC. Looking forward to your kind response. Thanks.
Chair, IEEE SCC42 Transportation (IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee on Transportation)
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.<SCC42-2015-A001 Sponsors Liaison Agreement.docx>