|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
15-138 is the original FCC DOCUMENT number, the not the FCC PROCEEDING number. The proceeding number is what is used to identify the right FCC database in which to file the comments.
Sorry for the confusion, but our .11 voters seem to prefer to refer to the document number in IEEE Mentor document titles and I didn’t want to change to avoid confusion among us as we responded to the proceeding.
US Mobile: 1.408.316.8312
From: Michael Lynch <MJLynch@mjlallc.com>
Date: Monday, January 25, 2016 at 1:00 PM
To: Paul Nikolich <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>, "STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG" <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>, John H Notor <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: RE: [802SEC] Filing of comments on bands above 24GHz
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
Could you please where the 15-138 came from?
Sent from my Windows 8.1 Phone
From: Paul Nikolich
Sent: â€ژ1/â€ژ25/â€ژ2016 14:54
Subject: [802SEC] Filing of comments on bands above 24GHz
I filed the 802 comments on 14-177 this afternoon, see below. I uploaded it to the 802.18 document repository at https://mentor.ieee.org/802.18/dcn/15/18-15-0072-08-0000-response-to-fcc-15-138.pdf
I looked for and found a Proceeding Number 15-138, but it did not have anything to do with bands above 24GHz, the 15-138 subject was "Transfer of Ownership and Control of Broadvox-CLEC, LLC to Onvoy, LLC ", so I filed it in Proceeding number 14-177, which I assume is correct. If not--please provide the correct proceeding number Mike and/or Vijay.