|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
j) The appeal was rejected by SASB appeal officers with the observation
that the SASB is open to requests for further corrective action. If the
applied measures are insufficient it notifies participants that improved
behavior must continue and be maintained.
j) An appeal was rejected by the SASB appeal officers.
you are going to cite the observation then we should quote the full
decision, and that is a couple extra pages. The second paragraph states
"For the reasons stated below, the SASB Appeal Officers have determined that Appellants have not established a prima facie case and that the appeal should therefore be dismissed."
The proposed observations is an excerpt from the SASB ops man "Section 220.127.116.11 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual"
Or As an alternative for j, cite the appeal decision document and a modified version the above cited quote:
“the SASB Appeal Officers have determined that Appellants have not established a prima facie case and that the appeal should therefore be dismissed”
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.Dear EC Members,I received a follow up request from IEEE SASB regarding our remedial action in the 802.11ax dominance situation. Attached is a draft response crafted by the investigation team, the 802.11 working group chairman and myself. If you have additional factual observations or edits, please recommend specific changes no later than by the end of this week, Friday 17 February 2017. Once I feel we've reached consensus on a response, I will conduct an EC email ballot on and forward to SASB (assuming it passes).Regards,--Paul