Re: [802SEC] 802.15 Responses to Comments on 15.13 PAR (aka 15.11)/CSD
The PAR is much improved! (Though I'm not personally happy with all responses, not sure what the reaction of others in 802.3 will be. The new PAR has a few editorial things that if updated might avoid NesCom comment.
5.2 -- Scope will be in the standard, and IEEE style is that five digit numbers have the thousand separator being a space, not a comma (10 000 instead of 10,000). The proper abbreviation is Gb/s rather than Gbits/s (also in Purpose).
5.4 -- This now is the first occurrence of RF. It is expanded in 5.5, but should be expanded on first use.
6.1.b -- Missing comma after CID. As RAC Chair, I'd support not having to expand acronyms for RAC products, the Yes field is really a note to the RAC and staff who won't be confused. Think about if you want to fix now of only if NesCom members comment.
8.1 -- First use acronyms should be expanded: MIMO, IR, UV, possibly WLAN (or replace WLAN with 802.11).
---- Bob Heile <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Hi All
> Attached are 4 docs: the comment resolution PPT, the revised PAR and CSD
> and a CSD redline. Please let me know if you have comments or questions.
> Bob Heile, Ph.D
> Director of Standards, Wi-SUN Alliance
> Chair, IEEE 802.15 Working Group on Wireless Specialty Networks
> Chair IEEE 2030.5 Working Group for Smart Energy Profile 2
> Co-Chair IEEE P2030 Task Force 3 on Smartgrid Communications
> 11 Robert Toner Blvd, Suite 5-301
> North Attleboro, MA 02763 USA
> Mobile: +1-781-929-4832
> email: email@example.com
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.