| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
1. PAR 6.1b – The explanation text seems to imply a review is not necessary.
Suggested Explanation Text:
“RAC should review the use of registry terms that appear in the document (e.g., OUI, Ethertype, EUI-64, EUI-48 and text suggesting using a mapping from EUI-48 to EUI-64 that is now deprecated because it potentially creates duplicate EUI-64 addresses).”
Also include the acronym expansion for “EUI”, “OUI”.
Respectfully submitted,
Jon
802.11 PAR Review SC Chair
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.Colleagues,
Comments on the PAR for P802.1AS-Rev - Timing and Synchronization for Time-Sensitive Applications were received from 802.11 and 802.3.
The responses to the comment are here:
http://ieee802.org/1/files/
public/docs2017/as-rev-PAR- modification-comments-0717- v01.pdf
The PAR Modification Request has been updated:
http://ieee802.org/1/files/
public/docs2017/as-rev-PAR- modification-0517-v02.pdf
Cheers,
Glenn.
--
Glenn Parsons - Chair, IEEE 802.1