The following was passed by Working Group 802.1 in its closing plenary, November, 1995: Resolve that: 802.1 requests its Secretariat to prepare and submit a PAR for P802.1Q "Standard for Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks" with the following Scope (Attachment A) and Purpose (Attachment B). 802.1 further approves the interpretations of these Scope and Purpose clauses contained in Attachment C for future reference in Working Group discussion. Attachment A: Scope of Proposed Project: To develop an architecture and bridge ([1]) protocols for the logical partitioning of a Bridged Local Area Network ([1], [2], [3]) that provides separate instances of the MAC service ([4]) to administratively defined groups of users, independent of physical location. The architecture and protocols will be compatible and interoperable with existing Bridged Local Area Network equipment and will support a range of implementations. To define basic management of the groups. This project will not include explicit consideration or development of multiple active paths within a VLAN, enhanced quality of service, or security facilities. However it will not preclude their eventual development except as restricted by ([1]). [1] ISO/IEC 10038, ANSI/IEEE Std. 802.1D Media Access Control (MAC) Bridges [2] ANSI/IEEE Std. 802.1D Annex C [3] P802.1G [4] ISO/IEC 15802-1, ISO/IEC 10039 MAC Service Definition Attachment B: Purpose of Proposed Project: The set of technologies known as Virtual LANs provide the equivalent of separate LANs over a single bridged LAN. Despite user demand there is currently no interoperability between different vendors, nor a coherent management framework for different techniques. This Standard will provide an architecture, protocols, and mappings for bridges to provide that interoperability and consistent management. Attachment C: Interpretations In Scope - "Users" includes the notion of different protocols in the same endstation using different VLANs. "Administratively defined" includes a wide range of user administrative choices from equipment purchase, through policy setting, static configuration, in-band and out of band management, and automatic configuration guided by policy choice. Logical partitioning of a Bridged Local Area Network by VLAN mechanisms may be an appropriate element in a comprehensive system of user security. However, an explicit orientation of VLAN to security may conflict with primary goals of ease of use, and would be a significant addition to the scope of this project. Further work in this area may take place under a separate PAR at an appropriate time. Consideration and accommodation of bridging techniques based on 802.1D (e.g., 802.5r Annex K) is within the scope of this PAR. "Compatible and interoperable" includes the idea that new bridges implementing 802.1Q can be intermixed with existing 802.1D bridges in configurations with require the latter to forward but not interpret VLAN information. "Multiple active paths within a VLAN" means multiple active paths between the same two users.