Date: 10 Jun 96 08:14:16 EDT
From: Tony Jeffree <100271.522@CompuServe.COM>
To: "\"Gideon Prat\"" <gideon@ilccm1.iil.intel.com>
Cc: 802-1 <P8021@hepnrc.hep.net>
Subject: Re: 802.1p/D3 Ballot


Gideon -

In your ballot comments, you write:

>>     Comment #1 - as many others, the Unicast Registration issue. (see 
>>     other's comments on this)

While I may have a clear idea of what you intend by this, I would prefer
that you are a little more specific here - e.g., specify *which* other
comments we should see.  It would be unfortunate for your intent (although
unlikely!) if we end up with a majority of comments favouring retention of
unicast registration... :-).  More to the point, if we end up with a spectrum
of different solutions to this issue (which is highly likely), it will be
difficult to identify your intent.

Regards,
Tony.