Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-CAC] Process question

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Chairs' Advisory Committee Reflector ---
Thank you James.

CAC members - FYI.

Dorothy


On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 11:02 AM James P. K. Gilb <Gilb_IEEE@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dorothy

Yes.  And, IMHO, it is in the spirit of what we wanted for the CAD.

James Gilb

On 10/16/20 3:15 PM, Dorothy Stanley wrote:
> Hello James,
>
> Thank you for this.
>
> Regarding:
>
> *Now, if the WG wants to kick off WG letter ballot and allow comments on
> the CAD as part of the WG ballot, then I think that could take on the task
> of the WG approving it. *
>
> Then the wording of the WGLB would need to be to "Approve sending the
> P802.11bd D1.0 draft to SA ballot and approve the CAD document"
>
> Would that work?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dorothy
>
> ----------------------
> Dorothy Stanley
> IEEE 802.11 WG Chair, dstanley@xxxxxxxx
> Hewlett Packard Enterprise
> dorothy.stanley@xxxxxxx <dstanley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> dstanley1389@xxxxxxxxx
> +1 630-363-1389 <630-363-1389>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 12:24 PM James P. K. Gilb <Gilb_IEEE@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Dorothy
>>
>> Sorry I am late on this.
>>
>> The rules are mostly silent on this issue, however, it says "the
>> wireless Working Group shall produce a coexistence assessment (CA)
>> document"
>>
>> So the question is, how does the WG produce the document, IMHO:
>> 1) Document is prepared in some fashion and then the WG says, yes, that
>> is the document.
>> 2) The WG authorizes a subgroup to prepare the document (similar to a BRC).
>>
>> As it is not a standard, the chair might rule the approval as not
>> technical and require only a 50% vote.  I think it should be 75% as it
>> is submitted as part of the WG letter ballot.
>>
>> Now, if the WG wants to kick off WG letter ballot and allow comments on
>> the CAD as part of the WG ballot, then I think that could take on the
>> task of the WG approving it.
>>
>> I suppose we should make this more explicit in clause 13 of the OM.
>>
>> James Gilb
>>
>> On 10/16/20 9:37 AM, Dorothy Stanley wrote:
>>> Hello James -
>>>
>>> If you could respond please -
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Dorothy
>>>
>>> ----------------------
>>> Dorothy Stanley
>>> IEEE 802.11 WG Chair, dstanley@xxxxxxxx
>>> Hewlett Packard Enterprise
>>> dorothy.stanley@xxxxxxx <dstanley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> dstanley1389@xxxxxxxxx
>>> +1 630-363-1389 <630-363-1389>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:17 AM Dorothy Stanley <dstanley1389@xxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello James,
>>>>
>>>> I would like your opinion on the following situation. Feel free to call
>> me
>>>> +1 630-363-1389.
>>>>
>>>> Initial WG Letter ballot
>>>> Sept WG interim: WG motion for Initial WGLB on P802.11bd D1.0 Passed.
>>>> P802.11bd PAR requires a Coex Assurance Document
>>>>
>>>> Oct: TG has prepared the CAD document.
>>>>
>>>> Question to you: Is WG approval of the CAD document required prior to
>>>> opening the initial WGLB?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Dorothy
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------
>>>> Dorothy Stanley
>>>> IEEE 802.11 WG Chair, dstanley@xxxxxxxx
>>>> Hewlett Packard Enterprise
>>>> dorothy.stanley@xxxxxxx <dstanley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> dstanley1389@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> +1 630-363-1389 <630-363-1389>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-CAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-CAC&A=1